One World Order Revisited

In this period of global economic stagnation, I am reminded of an aspect of U.S. history.

The problem in Europe has often centered on the fact that Germany, for example, doesn’t want its money and credit used to rescue Greece, Italy, etc.  Now, in America, if Mississippi is in the doldrums we have a federal system that allows credit and money to flow to our fellow citizens in Mississippi.

But there was a time when that couldn’t happen.  From 1777 until 1789 we had Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union.  That system of independent sovereign states was deemed totally inadequate to fulfill the goals of a nation which needed to grow and expand.  Hmm….grow and expand.  Where do we keep hearing those words these days?

Well, for years we have recoiled at the horror of the secret cabal attempting to institute a new ONE WORLD ORDER.  Oh the horror….the horror. 

If there was a one world order then India and Greece would be part of a global (read federal) system just like Mississippi and Ohio are part of a federal (read global) system.

Maybe all these evil, rich industrialists, bankers and politicos who advocate a one world order are not really plotting to enslave us all but rather they see the problems of nation states attempting to resolve economic problems as being quite similar to the problems of states attempting (and failing) to resolve economic problem under the Articles of Confederation.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Politics and Football

It appears the Republicans had far more super-pac money than the Democrats did, and yet President Obama won.  What does that say about the Citizens United decision?  Could it be that money does not win elections after all?  Perhaps so.

I predict the Mountaineers will have at least one more game where they look absolutely great.  The record will still relagate them to a “lesser” bowl and a so-so season, but one game (Oklahoma State?  Oklahomo?) will be a great WVU win.

Now that the election is over, don’t be surprised if interest rates start to creep upwards.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Football and Politics

I hope that the Mountaineers don’t run away with it against the Red Raiders this Saturday in Lubbock.  I hope it is a close game and not a 45 -14 blowout for the ‘eers.  Why?  I fear that if the high flying Mounties stomp the Red Raiders, they (being only human and very young) will start to believe their press clippings and will lay an egg against Kansas State the following week.  So I want a win….just not a big win.

The vice presidential debate was interesting.  Both sides made strategic mistakes in my opinion.  Ryan (and Romney) seem to feel they have to make some distinction between themselves and Obama when it comes to Iraq and Afganistan.  They don’t and they shouldn’t.  Trying to make artifical distinctions (Ryan:  We agree with the 2014 pull out we just feel it needs to be done responsibly ???) makes it look like you are arguing for the sake of arguing.  Besides, this election is not about Iraq and the Mideast.  The two parties are basically on the same page.  So don’t waste time jabbering about it and splitting hairs.  Move on the economy.  Bottom line:  Ryan wasted time and credibility trying to attack the Democrats on withdrawing troops from the Mideast.

Biden, of course, embarassed himself with all his smirking, laughing, interrupting and other high school reactions.  Very often he won the point on substance but upset undecideds when he mocked Ryan’s responses.  The Republicans will have a field day running ads of Biden laughing and smirking with the voice over being “considering the state of the economy and all the people who are hurting, why is this man laughing?  This election is no joking matter, Joe.”  I am afraid Joe spiked the ball in the end zone and fair minded people will hold that against him.




Enhanced by Zemanta

The Debate and WV vs. Texas

I guess it’s fair game, but everyone keeps hounding the candidates about the details of their tax plans as if once elected the president merely signs his plan and there you go.  Trouble is no matter what the candidate’s tax plan may be, the president does not pass legislation.  So, although I enjoy all the gotcha crap associated with “challenging” a candidate’s position, I am still confounded by the following:  Gee, Mitt, how you gonna do that if the Senate is controlled by the Democrats?  Hey, Barack, how you gonna do that if the House is controlled by the Republicans

If West Virginia can score two touchdowns in the first quarter, WVU will win no matter how poorly the defense plays.  If we have 10 or few points at half, well I fear the Longhorns will triumph.  My prediction?  WVU 35 Texas 28.

Enhanced by Zemanta



Obama is in over his head and doesn’t know how to improve the economy.  Our plan is ………………..?????

Romney is an out of touch multi-millionaire who is not one of us.  /s/ Franklin Roosevelt, John Kennedy, Jay Rockefeller.



For Fans of Pawn Stars

(Customer walks up to Rick at counter)

Rick:  What have you got there?

Customer:  This is a paint brush which has dried paint on it.

(Rick takes the brush from the customer and examines it)

Rick:  Paint brushes have been used for hundreds of years.  What you do is get one of these new then buy some paint and dip the brush into the paint.  That way they could paint wood, metal or just about anything they wanted to.  Where did you get this?

Customer:  I found it in my garage as I was cleaning out some trash.

(Cut to Rick alone removed from the customer)

Rick:  Used paint brushes have been around for hundreds of years.  If I can get this one at a decent price I definitely want it.

(Return to Rick and customer)

Rick:  Before I can give you a price I’d like to get a friend of mine to come down here and take a look at this.  Would that be alright?

Customer:  Sure.

(Later in episode a fellow joins Rick and the customer at the counter)

Rick voice over:  Tad Gack is a junk dealer.  Whenever I get something like a used paint brush in I like Tad to take a look at it and tell me what it’s worth.

(Tad shakes hands with Rick)

Tad:  What have you got, Rick?

Rick:  (hands him the used paint brush) 

Tad:  What are your concerns?

Rick:  Is it authentic and what is it worth?

Tad:  (examines the brush)  These are generally used to paint things.  There has to be a bucket of paint to go with it.  But I can tell by looking at this that it was used to paint something.  I can’t say what but all of this caked paint definitely shows it was used to paint something.

(Customer smiles)

Rick:  What is it worth?

Tad:  (hands it back to Rick) Nothing, Rick.  It’s a used paint brush.

Rick:  (turns to customer)  What did you want to do?  Pawn it or sell it.

Customer:  I want to sell it.

Rick:  What did you have in mind for a price?

Customer:  A hundred thousand dollars.

Rick:  Not going to happen.  I am thinking more in the range of ten bucks.

Customer:  Can you do fifty thousand?

Rick:  (thinks about it and rocks his head from side to side)  I can do twelve bucks.  That’s the best I can do.  Really, by the time I mount this in a nice frame I’ll have to find someone who collects these things and I have to make money.

(The Old Man comes up)

Old Man:  Rick, what the hell are you doing?

Rick:  I’m trying to buy this used paint brush.

Old Man:  You are buying a used paint brush!?! (The Old Man grabs his chest and keels over)

Rick:  Twelve bucks.  That’s the best I can do.

Customer:  OK.  We have a deal.

(Rick and customer proudly shake on the deal)

Rick:  Let’s do some paperwork.

Old Man:  (grabs Rick’s leg as he steps over the Old Man) Rick, you idiot!

(Rick jerks his leg away from the Old Man and gives him a mean stare)


Wealth as a Factor in Political Races

First of all, it is perfectly alright to point out that a candidate is wealthy and imply or actually state that because of that factor they should not be elected because they are “out of touch”, “don’t get it (whatever it is)” or will do things only for other rich people.  However, the electorate is not dumb.

There are successful politicians on both sides of the isle that had personal wealth.  JFK, FDR, John Kerry, John Edwards, Jay RockefellerGeorge Bush, Mitt Romney, Nelson Rockefeller.  (P.S.  I think Obama is now a millionaire in his own right as a result of his books.)

I believe the average voter does not consider personal wealth a reason to not vote for a candidate.  To the contrary, I think the average voter is actually comforted if the candidate has personal wealth because he or she (1) doesn’t need to get elected or more importantly re-elected in order to provide for his family, (2) is less susceptible to bribes or favors and (3) probably is in politics because they want to be not in order to make money!

And anyone who thinks the average American resents wealth or super wealth, think about the number of sports fans who pay good money for tickets or watch professional sports for entertainment.  They know perfectly good and well the athletes they are watching a multi-millionaires.  If the average American disliked those with disproportionate wealth, they would boycotted athletic events… gosh they certainly don’t do that. 

Bottom line?  People in America don’t vote against millionaires just because they are millionaires. 

Enhanced by Zemanta


Not Stephen – the other kind.

With all this discussion about jobs, remember there are three reasons a job is created.  The first reason a job is created is because somebody thinks they can make money paying a person to perform the required task.  This is why there is all this talk about uncertainty making CEO’s hesitant to spend the gobs of cash available. If one is uncertain as to tax rates, cost of benefits, regulation, etc. then it is hard to spend to create a job when that may not result in a profit.  The second reason a job is created is for the common good (building roads, funding medical research, fighting a war etc.)  The final reason a job is created is make someone more comfortable (household workers, gardeners, cooks etc; i.e. no profit motive).

The first category is obviously the business sector.  The second is government and non-profits.  The third is affluent people. 

Statistically, 75% of jobs fall in category one,  23% in category two and 2% in category three.


Enhanced by Zemanta